Greater Good · 22 hours ago
For decades, compassion has been cultivated one person at a time - a worthy practice, but one that has yet to move the needle on a world that seems to need it most at the scale of institutions and systems. Researchers Amy Richards and David Addiss are asking whether the tools of epidemiology - the science that tracks how disease spreads through populations - might help answer Buddhist scholar Thupten Jinpa's urgent question: why, despite growing interest in compassion training, is compassion not "scaling up"? Their work proposes that just as epidemiologists map where suffering clusters and why, they might also map where compassion clusters - and what conditions allow it to take root and spread. The inquiry is not without friction: epidemiologists have long dismissed compassion as too soft to measure, while compassion scholars worry that measuring it will diminish it, leaving researchers to find, as they put it, a "middle way" through genuine interdisciplinary dialogue. What the effort ultimately reveals is something quietly radical - that compassion may not be only a personal virtue but a property of systems, one that can be studied, nurtured, and perhaps, like the best of human contagions, deliberately spread.