Actually a nice idea...but I'd like to add that people shouldn't limit their definition of good deeds to enabling the habitual "needers" to sit around needing, needing, needing. For a New Year's resolution, what about dedicating half of our acts of kindness to people who have less than we have but who are *working*, who are offering something in return for something else...and who have been consistently ignored, exploited, and insulted throughout the "O'Bummer" Administration.
(For me, that might be a fellow writer in a less wealthy country. For most other U.S. citizens, it might be me.)
ORIGINAL COMMENT
Actually a nice idea...but I'd like to add that people shouldn't limit their definition of good deeds to enabling the habitual "needers" to sit around needing, needing, needing. For a New Year's resolution, what about dedicating half of our acts of kindness to people who have less than we have but who are *working*, who are offering something in return for something else...and who have been consistently ignored, exploited, and insulted throughout the "O'Bummer" Administration.
(For me, that might be a fellow writer in a less wealthy country. For most other U.S. citizens, it might be me.)