But the “soul” doesn’t exist. It’s a fantasy, just like the “individual” of individualism. I hope you see the irony of making “it” the centre of an approach. I’m comfortable with the need to address the fantasy of the individual, but it’s not right to replace it with the fantasy of the soul.
ORIGINAL COMMENT
But the “soul” doesn’t exist. It’s a fantasy, just like the “individual” of individualism. I hope you see the irony of making “it” the centre of an approach. I’m comfortable with the need to address the fantasy of the individual, but it’s not right to replace it with the fantasy of the soul.