I understand everyone will have their own reading experience and interpretation of this story. I found it a bit mundane in the sense of scavanging for some purpose or meaning behind the story until perhaps the very END of the story. This had me uninterested as it did not pose great relevance to the nature of Emerson, Mabie, Wordsworth, or Blake; and so be the rest of the trascendent minds from great authors of the past— may just be the literature I innately gravitate to. I found it was moreso TOO repetitve by its over saturated use for conducting and providing imagery that it left the reader with no fruit to eat and digest— be it as like an over seasoned dish and the taste is too inappropriately too much for like. As in, why am I eating this to begin with? What purpose does this food bear as I eat it? No well-nourished lesson was much to be absorbed or a piece that reveals some form of meaning and can do so CONTINUOUSLY through out a story or essay and not just merely at the end of their story.
I, too, understand literature is ultimately both objective and subjective in its own right. That is why, I believe, it is to be considered the "dynamics of dynamics," if you will— communication and interpetation for all. It is what has shaped this world into what we see today. So, with that said I am aware that if one wishes to merely give just detailed explanations with nothing much backed by reason, then I perhaps I can understand this may incline me to reveal a sense of freedom from this piece even it be mainly colorfuly descriptive but without much weight to bear— like that of a decorartive ensemble with no foundation.
ORIGINAL COMMENT
I, too, understand literature is ultimately both objective and subjective in its own right. That is why, I believe, it is to be considered the "dynamics of dynamics," if you will— communication and interpetation for all. It is what has shaped this world into what we see today. So, with that said I am aware that if one wishes to merely give just detailed explanations with nothing much backed by reason, then I perhaps I can understand this may incline me to reveal a sense of freedom from this piece even it be mainly colorfuly descriptive but without much weight to bear— like that of a decorartive ensemble with no foundation.