I recently had the chance to sit down with filmmaker Katie Teague, who is making a movie on money and growth. It is the fuel of finance, thus the economy, and thus the 'developed' world. A world of constant, infinite, compounded growth; without which the majority of our citizens would literally die, as jobs dried up and people couldn't afford basic necessities... but is this really true?
Ecologize Growth from Katie Teague on KarmaTube.
What's true in the macro is also true in the micro. As we all grow in our lives and careers, it's normal to expect a raise every year. Why? Because it's a signal of growth. Growing is good -- not growing is downright un-American. You didn't get a raise? You're not growing? Well then you must be no good.
But why only 1 way to measure growth? If I get a 10 percent raise next year but eat less healthy food, spend less time with close and extended community, or do more self-serving work, did I really grow? Just because the number is easy to measure, is that all that matters?
Here's a few other ways to grow besides financial:
- Grow in generosity (give more of yourself)
- Grow in compassion (connect more deeply with people/planet)
- Grow in physical health (deeper care for 'lifestyle habits')
- Grow in mental health (deeper knowledge/understanding of the world)
- Grow in family/community (build more and deeper ties with others based on shared values)
- Grow in balance/wisdom (continual movement towards deeper harmony within and without)
- Grow in fun! (deeper joy at every moment)
What if, at the end of every year, we took stock of ALL of these measures, along with financial? Would that change behavior?
All of these ideas are tougher to measure, but you know it when you have it and when you don't. Conversely, financial growth is actually destructive in the long-run. In the macro, we outstrip the biological capacity to match our insatiable needs, we increase inequity leading to crime/disease/uneducated society, we build a transactional (rather than trust) mindset into the culture. In the micro, as our financial capabilities grow, so do our waistlines/stress levels, our debt averages, and our disconnection from our fellow man.
So what to do? Even if I'm right, that just means we're doomed because we're part of a system that demands infinite growth... right? Well, no. Anything can be changed, but some things are harder than others. What we're talking about is a long project, and a systemic deconstructing of many implicitly held beliefs. There are people that are doing this now (in many ways). But it's not easy to deny gratifying easily attainable pleasures.
Here we have another reason to practice turning the lens within. Over time, it may become easier to not react to such desires and really begin to act in a way that brings true growth. If that starts to happen in many people at once, you have the start of a movement away from constant, insatiable, cancerous financial growth. And then! Who knows what will emerge? They say the future is already here, just not evenly distributed yet :)
COMMUNITY REFLECTIONS
SHARE YOUR REFLECTION
6 PAST RESPONSES
I like the "growing in fun" bit! :)
Thanks for sharing. I wonder if there is a holistic personal growth matrix that is already developed and being used out there?
Also, an effectively created holistic growth measurement matrix in education sector would be very useful to have, as I am an educator and seeking these types of assessment resources...
Any organizations, schools, people using this type of measurement system effectively would be of great interest to learn about. So please do pass on the info. Thank you.
@tayloraue:disqus I taylor Aue
what happened at the third world country's organization?
did the organization not serve the people ? and staff's salary increased ! is that a problem if the the staff worked harder as director's role or work becomes harder. things need a lot of carefulness before just saying words that don't relate too many certainties.
By Noor
Financial, academic and skills are what we need in order to attain a maximum life benefits.
I hope I have some of them and need more of them. As age goes by we will get. All it takes is patience and be pertinacious
Love what you say. I feel the same thoughts could be applied to education.
In that arena, the biggest measure of growth is test scores - i.e. grades and academic skills. What if all of those other areas you listed are also counted as indicators of growth. Not easy to measure like the scores, but I would argue even more valuable in the bigger picture of how do we create better lives for all.
How many times did you used trigonometry last week? How many times would a skill like managing a conflict in a healthy way have been useful? Trigonometry is not a bad thing (or chemistry etc), but does everybody have to learn them? Are these essential skills everyone must have? Critical thinking can be taught through many vehicles.
What if the very purpose of school - of this 12 (or more) year mandated subsidized training program we all go through, were to create a better (i.e. more peaceful, more joyful, more sustainable) life for all? What would we teach?
[Hide Full Comment]I like the intent and the spirit. But I disagree with the assertion that financial growth is inherently destructive. It's not an indefensible assertion, but I don't think it was adequately defended here. It's plain to see that there is plenty of supporting evidence that financial growth is, in fact, driving forces of inequality and suffering. However, I believe that this result is a perversion (albeit an increasingly popular one) of financial progress and not a fundamental of the pursuit.
Take for instance a non-for-profit organization that serves humanity's basic needs in some third world country. In its infancy, this hypothetical organization was likely conceived by a person, or group of people whose time was given pro-bono. As the organization grew and the demands on these peoples time became greater, they either became full time salaried directors, and/or hired some part-time paid help to handle the administrative duties of the organization. And as they continued to grow, these part time employees became full time, and the directors likely took modest increases to their salaries. Assuming no fraudulent or unethical financial practices, this company has served to create financial growth for its employees as it serves the greater good of humanity.
So while it's fair to say that financial growth certainly can be counter-productive, I think it's unfair to assume that this must always be the case.
[Hide Full Comment]