Kuna mabadiliko muhimu sana yanayoendelea katika jinsi tunavyofikiri
maendeleo. Idadi inayoongezeka ya wachumi, viongozi wa kisiasa na wachambuzi wataalam wanataka hatua bora zaidi za jinsi jamii inavyofanya vizuri; hatua ambazo hufuatilia sio tu hali yetu ya kiuchumi, lakini ubora wa maisha yetu kwa ujumla. Mabadiliko haya pia yanaonyesha jinsi wengi wetu wanavyohisi pia: kwamba uchumi wa kisasa wa watumiaji umeshindwa kutoa matokeo ya haki na maisha ya kuridhisha.
Katika miongo ya hivi karibuni maisha yetu yameelekezwa zaidi katika huduma ya uchumi, badala ya njia nyingine kote. Hata hivyo ukuaji wa uchumi kwa kweli ni njia tu ya kufikia malengo; ni muhimu tu ikiwa inachangia maendeleo ya kijamii na ustawi wa binadamu. Na msiba ni kwamba miongo kadhaa ya ukuzi na maendeleo ya kimwili yameshindwa kuleta ongezeko linalopimika la uradhi wa maisha.
Wakati waziri mkuu David Cameron alipotangaza kwamba anaomba Ofisi ya Takwimu za Kitaifa (ONS) ianze kupima ustawi wa taifa la Uingereza, hili lilipokelewa kwa dhihaka na kutumbuliwa macho kwenye vyombo vya habari. Wakosoaji walipendekeza kwamba lilikuwa ni jaribio la kijinga la kutukengeusha kutoka kwa matatizo yetu ya kiuchumi, au upotevu wa pesa tu wakati ambapo kuna mambo muhimu zaidi ya kuhangaikia.
Mawazo haya yanaeleweka, lakini yamewekwa vibaya. Bila shaka ni vigumu kuamini serikali inayodai kujitolea kwa ustawi huku ikipunguza ufadhili kwa huduma za umma zinazochangia hilo. Lakini kuona hili tu kupitia lenzi ya kisiasa itakuwa ni kukosa uhakika. Kuzingatia ustawi sio bughudha, ni kutafuta ni nini kitakachoboresha maisha ya watu na kisha kuchukua hatua, ambayo kwa hakika ni nini serikali nzuri inapaswa kuwa juu yake?
Kwa mara ya kwanza Uingereza sasa inapima rasmi na kuthamini hisia za watu kuhusu maisha yao. Hii si baadhi ya jinamizi Orwellian ambapo sisi ni kulazimishwa kuwa na furaha na kura yetu; kwa kweli ni kinyume kabisa. Ni fursa kwa serikali kusikiliza jinsi tunavyohisi na kujifunza kile tunachothamini zaidi. Baada ya muda inaweza kusababisha kuangazia zaidi mipango ambayo ni nzuri kwa ustawi wa watu, na utambuzi kwamba hizi sio sawa kila wakati na zile zinazofaa kwa kukuza uchumi.
Kwa hivyo tulijifunza nini kutokana na uchapishaji wa awali wa data ya afya ya ONS mnamo Desemba 2011? Licha ya hali mbaya na matatizo ya kiuchumi, inaonekana kwamba zaidi ya robo tatu ya watu walikadiria uradhi wao wa maisha kwa ujumla kuwa saba au zaidi kati ya kumi.
Nchi kama Denmark na Kanada hata hivyo, mara kwa mara hupata alama zaidi ya nane kati ya kumi kwa wastani wa kuridhika maishani, ili tuweze kufanya vyema zaidi. Cha kusikitisha zaidi, 8% ya watu walikadiria kuridhika kwa maisha yao kama chini ya 5 kati ya 10. Hili ni alama ya chini sana ya kuridhika ya maisha, sawa na alama za wastani katika nchi kama Bangladesh na Kambodia.
Cha kusikitisha zaidi ni kwamba, 27% ya watu walirekodi viwango vya juu vya wasiwasi. Baadhi ya haya yanaweza yanahusiana na hali ya kiuchumi, lakini mengi yake bila shaka yanaonyesha shinikizo kubwa ambalo watu wako chini yake katika jamii yetu inayozidi kuwa na ushindani. Wengi wanaoonekana kuwa na mafanikio katika hali ya nje, ya kimwili wanateseka sana kihisia na kisaikolojia.
Kuelewa matokeo haya na kile kinachoyasukuma kunapaswa kuwa kipaumbele cha juu kwa watunga sera. Ushahidi unapendekeza kwamba kuzingatia ustawi kunaweza kusababisha msisitizo mkubwa katika kukuza afya bora ya akili; kuweka utulivu wa kiuchumi kabla ya ukuaji wa uchumi; kufundisha stadi za maisha shuleni; na kusaidia familia zinazohitaji - hasa watoto wadogo katika miaka yao ya malezi. Kwa mfano, katika ngazi ya mtaa, baraza linalozingatia kufungwa kwa maktaba au eneo la michezo ili kutoa nafasi kwa maendeleo mapya ya kibiashara linaweza kutenda tofauti.
Lakini labda muhimu zaidi, kufikiria upya kile tunachotanguliza pia kuna maana kwa kila mmoja wetu kama mtu binafsi. Maadili ya ubinafsi ambayo yameambatana na azma yetu ya ukuaji wa uchumi yametutia moyo wengi wetu kutanguliza mafanikio yetu ya kifedha badala ya kujali ustawi wa familia zetu, jamii zetu na hata sisi wenyewe.
Sisi pia tunaweza kufaidika kutokana na mabadiliko ya vipaumbele na kutambua kwamba furaha ya kweli ni kidogo kuhusu kile tunachopata au kumiliki na zaidi kuhusu mahusiano yetu na hali ya akili; ni juu ya kile tunachoweza kuchangia kama kile tunachoweza kujipatia. Jamii yenye furaha huanza na kila mmoja wetu.
Kufikia jamii ambayo watu wengi iwezekanavyo wanastawi na watu wachache iwezekanavyo hawana furaha, kunahitaji mabadiliko ya kisera na kijamii. Iwapo wanasiasa watakosolewa, iwe kwa kushindwa kuboresha ustawi wa watu na sio kutaka kuipima. Lakini pia tutambue kuwa sote tunaweza kutekeleza jukumu letu katika kusaidia kuunda jamii yenye furaha zaidi.
COMMUNITY REFLECTIONS
SHARE YOUR REFLECTION
2 PAST RESPONSES
This article opens up a topic that has value at many levels. The concept of measuring "progress" seems to have the potential to be quite inexpensive while simultaneously being immensely relevant to our lives. Yet it also depends how this measuring process is framed, so perhaps the simplicity is a chimera that will be yet another battleground between competing political philosophies and hence worthless except as another way to separate us and cause endless fighting, suffering and misery. At a personal level, the concept of progress exists in our minds as a conceptual shield that we unconsciously adhere to in order to protect our individual selves from the fear of change. I think it's obvious that change is not always good and I (rightly, I think) fear that change is often not good at all; hence justifying our instinctual fear. In a very real sense it comes down to dealing with loss, or potential loss, while simultaneously trusting that those who promote the changes in our world have sufficient wherewithal to deserve to hold the power that moves us. The old must be destroyed in order for the new to arise. It’s much like watching a newborn baby move through a series of developmental stages in his or her infancy, and then later through childhood. It can be heartbreaking to see a joyful stage pass, yet another always seems to unfold to take its place, and it too is fulfilling like a kaleidoscope of permutations that continually evoke joy. A more abstract sense of this is represented in an age-old concept that is perhaps best represented in the popular image of the dancing Shiva... In one hand, Shiva holds fire which is symbolic in its destruction of the old. Another one of Shiva’s hands symbolically creates the new (progress) through the castanets. All of these processes are rendered simultaneously while Shiva effortlessly dances on the dwarf of ignorance. And here is where the danger lies... in our own institutionalized ignorance. Are we unwittingly the dwarves who are initiating the changes that we call progress or are we fortunate enough to replicate the Shiva consciousness? Are we capable of telling the difference and have we examined our unconscious assumptions? No – no of course not. Perhaps we imagine ourselves to be the protagonists when we are not. Are we that evolved as a society? If you are familiar with Maslow's hierarchy of needs it's painfully obvious that we are stuck at Stage 1 (safety needs). So if we look in the mirror, how evolved are we really? Really? So we speak of progress but by whose measure? In America we have basically three views, that of Republicans, Democrats and if we are open minded enough, Libertarians. So maybe we should consciously forget about measuring progress by some biased standard and instead simply focus on measuring our collective sense of well-being. Well being is just that - a misery index framed in positive words. We are compelled to frame this idea in the positive. In fact it’s critically important that we do - because in order to grow and evolve, we have to fight negativity at every level. It has to be an imperative on our behalf to embrace the positive, for that is our only hope to somehow find a higher level of consciousness; call it God if you will. Either way we have performed a spiritual alchemy on all of the potential red herrings due to a particular stripe of political polarization and created something positive, hopeful, and ultimately fulfilling.
[Hide Full Comment]From the article: "Many who appear successful in outward, material terms are actually suffering serious emotional and psychological trauma."
Current measures focus on material wealth(or the lack of it) and consequently, the long term costs to the individual and society are being ignored. I shared my views on this subject in my post "Evolving Measures" at http://xynobooks.com/2012/0...